Regenerative Indicators and Multi-Objective Optimization for ESG-Aligned Data Analytics Platforms in Product-as-a-Service Business Models

Authors

  • Bui Thanh Khoa Faculty of Commerce and Tourism, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City Author
  • Xi Yuan Sustainability and Entrepreneurship Research Centre (SERC), Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai Author

Keywords:

Product-As-A-Service (PaaS), Regenerative Sustainability, Multi-Objective Optimization, ESG Analytics, Internet of Things (IoT)

Abstract

We propose a novel data analytics platform that serves as the central optimization engine within a Product-as-a-Service (PaaS) business model, fundamentally reorienting conventional ESG analytics from cost minimization toward regenerative sustainability. The core innovation is a Regenerative Performance Indicator (RPI) Engine that computes three primary metrics from IoT sensor streams and external datasets: net biodiversity gain, soil carbon sequestration rate, and community resilience score. These indicators are then fed into a Long-Horizon Multi-Objective Optimization (LH-MOO) Module, which solves a constrained optimization problem over a thirty-year planning horizon. The module employs a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (NSGA-III) to generate a set of Pareto-optimal business-model configurations that simultaneously maximize cumulative restoration value while satisfying financial viability constraints. A key methodological contribution is the Sustainability-Adjusted Discount Rate (SADR), which replaces the conventional weighted average cost of capital by incorporating an environmental-intensity penalty that increases the discount rate for configurations exceeding planetary boundaries. Furthermore, a Scenario Simulation Module stress-tests each Pareto-optimal portfolio against multiple Shared Socioeconomic Pathways using stochastic differential equations, thereby computing the probability of long-term viability under diverse external conditions. The closed-loop architecture integrates directly with existing IoT sensor networks and asset lifecycle management modules, transforming raw operational data into actionable portfolios that actively restore ecological and social systems. This work is significant because it provides a rigorous, data-driven framework for operationalizing regenerative sustainability within PaaS business models, moving beyond traditional ESG reporting to embed ecological restoration and social resilience directly into the core optimization logic of the enterprise.

References

MA Curran. Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Technical report, books.google.com, 2012.

Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur. Business model generation : A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. 2010.

Johan Rockström, Will Steffen, Kevin Noone, Åsa Persson, F. Stuart III Chapin, Eric Lambin, Timothy M. Lenton, Marten Scheffer, Carl Folke, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Björn Nykvist, Cynthia A. de Wit, Terry Hughes, Sander van der Leeuw, Henning Rodhe, Sverker Sörlin, Peter K. Snyder, Robert Costanza, Uno Svedin, Malin Falkenmark, Louise Karlberg, Robert W. Corell, Victoria J. Fabry, James Hansen, Brian Walker, Diana Liverman, Katherine Richardson, Paul Crutzen, and Jonathan Foley. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 2009.

J Villat and KA Nicholas. Quantifying soil carbon sequestration from regenerative agricultural practices in crops and vineyards. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2024.

DZX Huang. Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: Valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives. Accounting & Finance, 2022.

Steve Evans, Doroteya Vladimirova, Maria Holgado, Kirsten Van Fossen, Miying Yang, Elisabete A. Silva, and Claire Y. Barlow. Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5):597–608, 2017.

R Naeem, M Kohtamäki, and V Parida. Artificial intelligence enabled product-service innovation: past achievements and future directions. Technical report, osuva.uwasa.fi, 2024.

GJ Foster and R Saleh. The circular city and adaptive reuse of cultural heritage index: measuring the investment opportunity in europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021.

G Balletto, M Ladu, C Federico, E Ghiani, and T Jacopo. More circular city in the energy and ecological transition: a methodological approach to sustainable urban regeneration. Sustainability, 2022.

A Chizaryfard, P Trucco, and C Nuur. The transformation to a circular economy: framing an evolutionary view. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2021.

Yasser Eliwa, Ahmed Aboud, and Ahmed Saleh. Esg practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from eu countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79:102097, 2019.

Bohyun Yoon, Jeong Hwan Lee, and Ryan Byun. Does esg performance enhance firm value? evidence from korea. Sustainability, 10(10):3635, 2018.

SHIRA COHEN, IGOR KADACH, GAIZKA ORMAZABAL, and STEFAN REICHELSTEIN. Executive compensation tied to esg performance: International evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(3):805–853, 2023.

Giuliana Birindelli, Stefano Dell’Atti, Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi, and Marco Savioli. Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on esg performance in the banking system. Sustainability, 10(12):4699, 2018.

D Chen, T Shu, and CY Yao. Understanding esg disclosures: Financial motives, performance, and greenwashing. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2025.

Hans B. Christensen, Luzi Hail, and Christian Leuz. Mandatory csr and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3):1176–1248, 2021.

So Ra Park and Jae Young Jang. The impact of esg management on investment decision: Institutional investors’ perceptions of country-specific esg criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3):48, 2021.

Sang Kim and Zhichuan (Frank) Li. Understanding the impact of esg practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 13(7):3746, 2021.

E Zerdali, J Riccio, J Bonaldo, M Rivera, et al. A cost-effective and flexible decision-making method for multi-objective finite control set model predictive control. IEEE Access, 2025.

K Reddy, R Sarma, and D Guha. Performance analysis of advanced metaheuristics for optimal design of multi-objective model predictive control of doubly fed induction generator. Processes, 2025.

Q Ma, Y Ma, J Gao, and H Chen. Hierarchical model predictive control for battery thermal management and lifetime protection in connected electric vehicles. In 2025 40th Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), 2025.

J Fu, Y Long, K Chen, W Wei, et al. Multi-objective cross-task learning via goal-conditioned gpt-based decision transformers for surgical robot task automation. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024.

D Tian, L Zhou, C Zhang, and Y Li. Multi-robot cooperative transportation of irregular objects by multi-objective optimization with distributed control. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2025.

L Ante, FP Wazinski, and A Saggu. Research streams in biodiversity finance: A bibliometric analysis and research agenda. Technical report, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.21569, 2026.

E Aguilera, G Guzmán, and A Alonso. Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional and organic cropping systems in spain. ii. fruit tree orchards: E. aguilera et al. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015.

H Cai, NSN Lam, Y Qiang, L Zou, RM Correll, et al. A synthesis of disaster resilience measurement methods and indices. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018.

Bingdong Li, Jinlong Li, Ke Tang, and Xin Yao. Many-objective evolutionary algorithms. ACM Computing Surveys, 48(1):1–35, 2015.

K Riahi, DP Van Vuuren, E Kriegler, J Edmonds, et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use. Technical report, dspace.library.uu.nl, 2017.

Meredith A. Lane. The global biodiversity information facility. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 30(1):22–24, 2003.

D Berardi, E Brzostek, E Blanc-Betes, B Davison, et al. 21st-century biogeochemical modeling: challenges for century-based models and where do we go from here? GCB Bioenergy, 2020.

Jung Wan LEE. Green finance and sustainable development goals: The case of china. Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business, 7(7):577–586, 2020.

M Failasufa and M Mukhtaruddin. The influence of capital budgeting methods on the feasibility of company investment: a literature review study. Jurnal Manajemen Perbankan Keuangan dan Neraca, 2025.

Nicola K Gale, Gemma Heath, Elaine Cameron, Sabina Rashid, and Sabi Redwood. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13 (1):117, 2013.

Florian Berg, Julian F Kölbel, and Roberto Rigobon. Aggregate confusion: The divergence of esg ratings. European Finance Review, 26(6):1315–1344, 2022.

and B Groom, F Venmans, C Paul, et al. Trends in tropical forest loss and the social value of emission reductions. Nature Sustainability, 2023.

M Loreau. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1998.

H. Vereecken, A. Schnepf, J.W. Hopmans, M. Javaux, D. Or, T. Roose, J. Vanderborght, M.H. Young, W. Amelung, M. Aitkenhead, S.D. Allison, S. Assouline, P. Baveye, M. Berli, N. Brüggemann, P. Finke, M. Flury, T. Gaiser, G. Govers, T. Ghezzehei, P. Hallett, H.J. Hendricks Franssen, J. Heppell, R. Horn, J.A. Huisman, D. Jacques, F. Jonard, S. Kollet, F. Lafolie, K. Lamorski, D. Leitner, A. McBratney, B. Minasny, C. Montzka, W. Nowak, Y. Pachepsky, J. Padarian, N. Romano, K. Roth, Y. Rothfuss, E.C. Rowe, A. Schwen, J. Šimůnek, A. Tiktak, J. Van Dam, S.E.A.T.M. van der Zee, H.J. Vogel, J.A. Vrugt, T. Wöhling, and I.M. Young. Modeling soil processes: Review, key challenges, and new perspectives. Vadose Zone Journal, 15(5):1–57, 2016.

Peter Evans. Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development, 24(6):1119–1132, 1996.

S Lanzisera, AR Weber, A Liao, et al. Communicating power supplies: Bringing the internet to the ubiquitous energy gateways of electronic devices. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Regenerative Indicators and Multi-Objective Optimization for ESG-Aligned Data Analytics Platforms in Product-as-a-Service Business Models. (2026). Journal of Business Strategy and Management Review, 1(1), 1-16. https://landing.wrunion.org/ojs/index.php/jbsmr/article/view/29